AI quality control
Detecting surface, assembly, completeness and labelling defects. An OK/NOK decision with the defect location marked and the image archived.
Machine vision and production
We build AI-based machine vision systems that check every part on the line, detect defects, measure and count, and pass the result on: to the PLC, a robot or the shift report. We have experience in automation and robotics, and we design our own electronics and prototypes.
A machine vision system is a camera, lighting and software that judge a product from an image. Classic systems follow fixed rules and handle repeatable measurements well. AI adds what rules struggle with: defects whose appearance varies, such as scratches, inclusions, discolouration or incorrect assembly, and products that differ between batches. The model learns from images of good and defective parts from your own line.
Choose a part and run the inspection. You'll see how the system pinpoints the defect, makes a decision and logs it in the shift report. Values in the demo are examples.
Choose a part and press “Inspect part”.
Values are examples. In a real deployment the model learns from images of your parts and your defects, and we set the reject thresholds together with your quality team.
We look at the line, the parts and the defects and set the requirements: cycle time, resolution, lighting conditions, how parts get rejected.
Using images from your production, we check whether the defects can be detected with the required accuracy before you buy any hardware.
Choice of cameras and lighting, the AI model, integration with the PLC, robot or reject unit and with your reporting system.
Go-live on the line, tuning thresholds together with your quality team, retraining the model on new cases.
Detecting surface, assembly, completeness and labelling defects. An OK/NOK decision with the defect location marked and the image archived.
Dimension measurement, counting parts and packages, reading codes and markings, recognising the product variant.
We design electronics, controls and station prototypes. When an off-the-shelf device doesn't fit, we build our own.
Integration with robots, PLCs and production systems. Shift reports, alerts and quality data go where they're needed.
They work best where inspection is manual today, defects vary and an escaped defect is expensive.
Scratches, pitting, missing holes, threads, out-of-tolerance dimensions. Also part inspection before shipping.
Assembly completeness, component placement, connectors, cables, labels and markings.
Package completeness, label legibility, piece counting, pallet checks before loading.
You don't always need AI. If the task is measuring one dimension under repeatable conditions, a classic vision system is often simpler and cheaper. AI has the edge with irregular defects, variable products and difficult lighting. During the analysis we tell you straight which approach makes sense for your line.
The vision system is only part of the station. What matters is what happens after the decision: the signal to the PLC, the reject unit, the sorting robot, the entry in the report. We have experience in automation and robotics, so we design the whole station rather than just the camera, and we build the electronics and prototypes ourselves.
Cost depends on the number of cameras and stations, the line's cycle time, the type of defects, the required accuracy and the integration with automation. We start with a feasibility test on your images so you know what to expect before buying hardware. You get the quote in writing.
It depends on the defect and how much the product varies. A few hundred images are often enough to start, and we keep retraining the model while the line runs. We set the number in the feasibility test.
We size the hardware to the cycle time. The model runs locally at the line (edge AI), so the decision is made in real time without sending images to the cloud.
Yes, integration with automation is part of the deployment. We check the specific interfaces during the station analysis.
We're based in Wrocław, Poland, and deliver projects across Poland and Europe. We usually do the station analysis on site; later work is partly remote.
The system flags uncertain cases for a person to review, and those images go into retraining the model. You set the decision thresholds together with your quality team.
Send a few images of defective parts or tell us about the station. In 65 minutes we'll assess whether AI visual inspection makes sense here and what a feasibility test would look like.
Book a consultation